Comparison of AIR-Q vs AMBUAURAGAIN for tracheal intubation in pediatric patient under general anesthesia using microcuff tube.

A randomized comparative study to compare AIR-Q vs AMBUAURAGAIN as conduit for blind tracheal intubation using microcuff tube in pediatric patient under general anesthesia in Department of Anesthesia, SMS Medical college, Jaipur - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/081713

Enrollment

100

Registered

2025-03-05

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N51- Disorders of male genital organs in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 2: Q541- Hypospadias, penile Health Condition 3: Q542- Hypospadias, penoscrotal

Interventions

Intervention1: AIR-Q: To compare AIR-Q intubating laryngeal airway with AMBUAURAGAIN laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation with microcuff tube in pediatric patient undergoing elective surgery u

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)ASA grade 1 and 2 2)Undergoing elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation 3)Parent/guardian willing to provide consent for participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Abnormal airway anatomy assessed by passive mouth opening, micrognathia, thyromental distance, and submental compliance, intra oral growth. 2. Patient with cardiopulmonary disease 3. Severe gastrointestinal reflux 4.History of upper respiratory tract infection in previous 14 days. 5.Patient should not be part of other study 6. Non co-operative patient

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate first attempt success rate of blind tracheal intubation through AIR-Q and AMBUAURAGAIN using microcuff tube in pediatric patient.Timepoint: To assess and compare intubating characteristics of AIR-Q versus AMBUAURAGAIN in terms of: 1.Time taken for intubation. 2.Number of attempts for blind tracheal intubation. 3.Maneuver applied for intubation. 4.Time taken for removal of device after intubation is accomplished.	—

Measure

Time frame

To evaluate first attempt success rate of blind tracheal intubation through AIR-Q and AMBUAURAGAIN using microcuff tube in pediatric patient.Timepoint: To assess and compare intubating characteristics of AIR-Q versus AMBUAURAGAIN in terms of: 1.Time taken for intubation. 2.Number of attempts for blind tracheal intubation. 3.Maneuver applied for intubation. 4.Time taken for removal of device after intubation is accomplished.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess and compare insertion characteristics of AIR-Q versus AMBUAURAGAIN in terms of:Timepoint: 1)Time taken in insertion of devices. 2) Number of attempts for insertion. 3)Ease of insertion. 4)Oropharyngeal leak pressure.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Priya Rathore

Sawai man singh medical college and attached hospitals jaipur

Neelam_dogra24@yahoo.com9928709289

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026