Skip to content

Comparing the Detection of Tuberculosis in Children: Testing Sputum Collected with Saline Nebulization vs. Stomach Fluid Samples

Comparison of the Yield of CBNAAT (Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test) Positivity in Sputum Induced with Nebulized Hypertonic Saline versus Gastric Lavage Samples in Children with Clinically Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/081585
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-03-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: A150- Tuberculosis of lung

Interventions

Intervention1: Intervention details are not applicable as we are comparing two diagnostic techniques.: NIL Control Intervention1: Comparison: Comparison of yield of CBNAAT Positivity in sputum induced

Sponsors

Cipla Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis or disseminated tuberculosis, defined as a child with any of the symptoms or signs suggestive of TB i.e.(NTEP guidelines 2023), Fever >2 weeks ,Significant weight loss (loss of >5% of highest weight recorded in the past 3 months) or not gaining weight, Cough >2weeks, Abnormalities of chest radiograph (parenchymal infiltrate, atelectasis, pleural effusion, or lymphadenopathy) ln contact of a TB case - Children with suspected immunodeficiency where PTB has to be ruled out , Children with chronic lung diseases (cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis) where PTB should be ruled out

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with a history of prior bronchospasm attributed to inhaled therapies, Children with a history of recent haemoptysis or pneumothorax ,Children with respiratory failure ,Patient with uncontrolled asthma or signs of upper airway obstruction. Unconscious children (GCS <8) or children with convulsions, Patients in whom consent could not be obtained, Children only with extrapulmonary TB

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) Of CBNAAT Of induced sputum and GA respectively compared to the gold standard (MGIT)Timepoint: Only one time only at the time of diagnostic testing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
correlation between two methods of CBNAAT testing (sputum induction vs gastric aspirate/ lavage) b.To assess the feasibility of inducing an adequate amount of sputum c. To assess for adverse effects of sputum induction and gastric lavage d.To see how all three tests (sputum CBNAAT, GA/ GL CBNAAT and MGIT) correlate with clinically significant pulmonary tuberculosis Timepoint: Only one time only at the time of diagnostic testing.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMonica Mahendru

AIIMS , Rishikesh

lokeshdoc@yahoo.com9631638095

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026