Skip to content

Comparison of three different gingival retraction systems with aluminium chloride

A comprehensive comparative evaluation of three aluminium chloride based gingival retraction systems : An In Vivo study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/081551
Enrollment
45
Registered
2025-03-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Retraction cord: Retraction cord with fine metal filament bounded with nylon. Impregnation with aluminium chloride promotes quick haemostasis and retraction. Intervention2: Astringent R

Sponsors

Dr Rashi Negi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Forty five patients whose age is more than eighteen years will be selected, requiring fixed prosthesis in maxillary or mandibular molars, the tooth can be vital or non-vital. Clinically and radiographically healthy gingiva and periodontium around the abutment and abutment teeth should be of normal size and contour (no developmental anomaly or regressive age changes).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with age less than eighteen years. Gingival or periodontal disease. Uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, hyperthyroidism and other cardiovascular disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Vertical displacement (distance from CEJ to gingival margins in mm - sulcus depth) will be measured by three gingival retraction systems clinically. Lateral displacement of gingiva achieved by three systems microscopically from the cast obtained by the die stones at baseline impressions.Timepoint: After retraction the sulcus depth( vertical displacement) will be measured at baseline with approximate duration of 30 minutes and sulcus width( horizontal displacement) will be measured microscopically from the casts obtained by baseline impressions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The duration of time taken for placement of each retraction system can be evaluated by the time of initiation of placement till the time placement has been achieved. The duration of haemorrhage by each retraction system can be compared on the basis of haemorrhage score.Timepoint: After retraction records will be measured at baseline with approximate duration of 30 minutes.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rashi Negi

Uttaranchal Dental and Medical Research Institute

drshwetagupta173@gmail.com9997206868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026