FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluation of Digital Impressions and Conventional Impression Methods among patients with Completely Edentulous Maxillary Arch

Comparative evaluation of the peripheral border extensions, compressibility of posterior palatal seal, and trueness of impressions made using conventional and digital impression techniques in a fully edentulous maxilary arch: In-vivo prospective study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/081370
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-02-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: DIGITAL IMPRESSION: The digital intraoral scan of the edentulous maxillary ridge will be made using an intraoral scanner (3Shape TRIOS® 3 wired). The scanned impression will be converte

Sponsors

Dr Saif Momin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Completely Edentulous Maxillary Arch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Dentulous Maxillary Arch Severe Bony Undercuts in the Maxillary Arch requiring Alveoloplasty

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of Peripheral Border Extensions, Compressibility of Posterior Palatal Seal Between the two GroupsTimepoint: Immediately after obtaining impressions—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of Trueness of Impressions between the two groupsTimepoint: Immediately after obtaining impression—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Saif Momin

YENEPOYA DENTAL COLLEGE

drhsarfaraz@yenepoya.edu.in9845083778

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026