FindTrial
Sign In

To see if a new test Electrical Impedance Tomography is better than usual methods at predicting whether patients can breathe on their own after ventilator being removed.

A prospective observational study to compare electrical impedance tomography parameter with conventional parameters in the prediction of spontaneous breathing trial success - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/081108
Enrollment
75
Registered
2025-02-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J958- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of respiratory system, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Dr Aditi Yadav
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Age more than 18 years 2 On invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours who are eligible to undergo SBT 3 GCS more than 12 4 Presence of cough during suctioning and need for infrequent tracheal suctioning 5 PaO2 FiO2 ration more than equal to 200 mm Hg with PEEP less than equal to 5 cm H2O and FiO2 less than equal to 0.4 6 Stable cardiovascular status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Presence of chest burn 2 Pregnancy 3 Recent within one week thoracic surgery or chest trauma 4 Patients with pneumothorax or surgical emphysema

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A novel parameter to predict SBT successTimepoint: 30 minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To predict extubation successTimepoint: 24 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aditi Yadav

Medanta The Medicity

poojatyagi1919@gmail.com8860037475

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026