FindTrial
Sign In

The study comparing direct laryngoscopy (DL) and video laryngoscopy (VL) for tracheal intubation

A comparative study between conventional direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy with respect to different parameters affecting endotracheal intubation - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/080828
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-02-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K810- Acute cholecystitis

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Bankura Sammilani Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: to compare duration of tracheal intubation in direct and video laryngoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having Mallampati grade 3 or more. BMI 30KG/M2 or above. Limited neck extension Thyromental distance less than 6 cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the duration of tracheal intubation between two groups.Timepoint: SECONDS TO MINUTE—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to determine intubation difficulty score Timepoint: EASY TO DIFFICULT—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR Debarati Goswami

bankura sammilani medical college

drdebashishsaha1965@gmail.com9434100947

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026