Skip to content

Study Comparing the Effectiveness of IPSS and VPSS, Questionnaires for Evaluating Urinary Symptoms.

A prospective, observational study to compare the effectiveness of self-administered patient questionnaires, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Visual Prostate Symptom Score (VPSS), in evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic enlargement. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/080815
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-02-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N401- Benign prostatic hyperplasia withlower urinary tract symptoms

Interventions

Sponsors

Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male patients older than 45 years of age. Male patients who presented to the Urology OPD with chief complaint of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). Patients giving consent for taking part in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had undergone surgical treatment due to a diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Patients who had been receiving medical treatment with a diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Patients with urethral stricture. Patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level above 4 ng/dl. Patients with systemic neurological disease. Patients with history of pelvic radiotherapy. Patients who had been diagnosed with Neurogenic Bladder. Patients with Vesical calculi, Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection, Carcinoma Bladder. Patients who are Blind/Visually impaired. Patients with indwelling Per urethral or Suprapubic catheters. Patients on Diuretic therapy. Patients with voided volume less than 150 mL.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Validation of VPSS as a simplified alternative to IPSS, focusing on its reduced number of questions and use of pictorial aids. Development and validation of a new severity grading system for VPSS to improve its diagnostic capability in the Indian context. Patient preference and ease of use of VPSS compared to IPSS, evaluated through feedback and completion rates. Overall clinician efficiency improvement by utilizing VPSS in routine practice. Timepoint: on week 24.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sivaprasad Gourabathini

Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute

drsivaprasad.g@bhaktivedantahospital.com8879614446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026