Comparative study between cad-cam technology designed (3d printed) versus conventional bite splints in joining of displaced lower jaw fractures

Comparative study between cad-cam designed (3d printed ) versus conventional occlusal splints in reduction of displaced mandibular fractures - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/02/080796

Enrollment

Registered

2025-02-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S026- Fracture of mandible

Interventions

Intervention1: use cad cam splint vs conventional splint in achieving intraop occlusion: sample size is 30 and 15 will be in conventional group and 15 patients in study group Fabrication of conventio

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 20 and 60 years. Presence of mandibular fractures with displacement Presence of post-traumatic malocclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with undisplaced mandibular fractures. Presence of post-traumatic occlusion. Any underlying condition such as severe systemic diseases, inability to undergo surgery, previous mandibular surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Occlusion stability 2. Interfragmentary distance between two displaced fractured segments post reduction to be measured intraoperativelyTimepoint: post op day 1 post op day 7 post op day 30	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
surgeon comfort while using the splint patient comfort & post op occlusionTimepoint: post op occlusion to be assessed at 1st day post op 7 days post op 30 days post op	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRIDDHI H PATIL

Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth

nileshmishra1934@gmail.com9158542384

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026