Comparing PENG Block and Anterior QL Block for Comfort and Pain Relief After surgeries around Hip.

To study and compare pericapsular nerve block versus anterior qudratus lumborum block for ease of position during spinal and post operative analgesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic hip surgeries under spinal anaesthesia-a prospective randomized controlled study - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/02/080720

Enrollment

Registered

2025-02-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided Pericapsular Nerve Group block: Patient undergoing orthopedic surgeries around hip will receive ultrasound guided Pericapsular Nerve Group block with 20 ml of 0.25% Bu

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I, II ,III BMI -18.5- 24.9kg/m2 Orthopaedic surgery around hip

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Fracture old than 2 weeks Unwilling patients Pregnancy Patient having no pain while sitting Any bleeding disorder and patient on anticoagulant. Neurological and musculoskeletal disease. Local infection at the site of injection. History of allergy to local anaesthetic agent.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) To analyse & compare pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and 15 degrees passive leg elevation at 0, 10 minutes and 20, 30 minutes after giving US guided PENG block & QL Block. 2) To evaluate & compare ease of giving a sitting position for spinal anaesthesia using 4-point EOSP score in both the groups. 3) To evaluate & compare time to first rescue analgesia in both groups. 4) To evaluate & compare total pain free period in both the groups. 5) To evaluate & compare the consumption of total doses of inj diclofenac as post operative analgesic requirement in both the group. 6) Patient satisfaction score. Timepoint: 0min 10min 20min 30 min	—

Measure

Time frame

1) To analyse & compare pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and 15 degrees passive leg elevation at 0, 10 minutes and 20, 30 minutes after giving US guided PENG block & QL Block. 2) To evaluate & compare ease of giving a sitting position for spinal anaesthesia using 4-point EOSP score in both the groups. 3) To evaluate & compare time to first rescue analgesia in both groups. 4) To evaluate & compare total pain free period in both the groups. 5) To evaluate & compare the consumption of total doses of inj diclofenac as post operative analgesic requirement in both the group. 6) Patient satisfaction score. Timepoint: 0min 10min 20min 30 min

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To monitor and compare hemodynamic parameter at rest and 15 degree passive leg elevationTimepoint: 0min 10 min 20 min 30 min	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhanu gupta

Dr. RPGMC TANDA kangra

bhanurpgmc@gmail.com9418016807

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026