FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the intubation characteristics using two different methods video and mcCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing General anaesthesia

Evaluation of intubation characteristics of video larynngoscope and mcCoy laryngoscope in patients undergoing general anesthesia - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/080560
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-02-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring Health Condition 2: 4- Measurement and Monitoring Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 4: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 5: R098- Other specified symptoms and signsinvolving the circulatory and respiratory systems

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Mallampatti grade I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mallampatti grade III and IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the intubation characteristics of video larynngoscope and mcCoy laryngocope in patients undergoing general anesthesiaTimepoint: Hemodynamic parameters will be assessed till 20 minutes at time interval of 0,1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes post successful intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess number of attempts, hemodynamic parameters & adverse effects if any while using both laryngoscopeTimepoint: Hemodynamic parameters will be assessed till 20 minutes at time interval of 0,1,2,3,5,10,15 & 20 minutes post successful intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sandeep Rathore

Gandhi Medical College Bhopal

awasya.84@gmail.com7505738098

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026