Skip to content

Comparison of clinical effect of composite layered polyetheretherketone (PEEK) crown and porcelain fused to metal (PFM) crown: a ranndomized controlled clinical study

Evaluation and comparison of clinical performance of composite layered polyetheretherketone (peek) full coverage crown and porcelain fused to metal (pfm) full coverage crown: a randomized controlled clinical study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/080376
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: PEEK(polyetheretherketone) full coverage crown: To evaluate clinical performance of PEEK in terms of anatomical contour, marginal integrity, Restoration staining, Color match, Surface

Sponsors

Dr Dhwani Patel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 2. Patients with endodontically treated maxillary or mandibular 1st or 2nd molar. 3. Antagonist teeth should be present 4. Height abutment teeth should be approximately 3 mm on the buccal and lingual sides after preparation 5. Patients with good oral hygiene 6. Absence of parafunctional habits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To evaluate the clinical performance of PEEK and PFM in terms of anatomical contour, marginal integrity, Restoration staining, Color match, Surface texture using the modified Ryge s criteria. 2.To evaluate and compare the periodontal status of PEEK and PFM using Russel s periodontal index Timepoint: baseline = T0 After 3 Months = T1 After 6 Months = T2

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare the clinical performance of PEEK and PFM in terms of anatomical contour, marginal integrity, Restoration staining, Color match, Surface texture using the modified Ryge s criteria. 2. To compare the periodontal status of PEEK and PFM using Russel s periodontal index Timepoint: After 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Deeksha Gupta

Manubhai Patel Dental College

dr.deeksha.sharma@gmail.com8141007846

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026