Skip to content

To compare efficacy of sacral erector spinae plane block and wound infiltration in lower lumbar spine surgeries

Comparative Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Wound Infiltration in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/02/080351
Enrollment
62
Registered
2025-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane block: After giving general anesthesia to the patient the patient will be made prone and under ultrasound guidance sacral erector spinae plane block will be

Sponsors

All India Institute Of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Either Sex • Age 18-70 years • Patients scheduled for Trans-foraminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patient with coagulopathy • Patient allergic to local anaesthetic • Chronic opioid dependence or use of painkillers for more than 3 months • Inability to communicate due to severe dementia, language barrier, or end-stage disease • Comorbidity of the central and/or peripheral nervous system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
. To compare the postoperative opioid consumption between sacral ESP block and Wound Infiltration in patients undergoing TLIF surgeries under general anaesthesia.Timepoint: 30 min., 1 hr,2,4,8,12,24 hr postopeartively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
. To compare total intraoperative fentanyl requirement between the two groups. 2. To compare the time to first rescue analgesia requirement in the post-operative period between the two groups 3. To compare postoperative pain at rest as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale in both groups at 30mins, 1hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively. 4. To compare incidence of PONV in both groups at 30mins, 1hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively Timepoint: 30 min., 1 hr, 2,4,8,12,24 hr postopeartively

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSachin Kumar

All India Institute Of Medical Sciences,New Delhi

docsachin.k@gmail.com9871549343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026