Comparing Self drilling screws with Conventional screws in facial fractures

Comparative Evaluation of Self Drilling Titanium Screw Vs Conventional Screw for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Mid Face Fractures - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/02/080090

Enrollment

Registered

2025-02-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S024- Fracture of malar, maxillary and zygoma bones

Interventions

Intervention1: Self Drilling screw: They have a drill bit-like tip, allowing them to drill their own pilot hole as they are screwed into materials like metal, wood, or plastic. This eliminates the nee

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both genders in the age group of less than 60 years. Patients who needs Open Reduction And Internal Fixation (ORIF) in mid face fractures. Patients who maintain satisfactory oral hygiene and are co-operative. Patients who could come for regular follow up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient who have any uncontrolled systemic condition that may contraindicate surgery. Systemic bone diseases such as osteoporosis, osteopenia, osteopetrosis. Patients under long-term corticosteroid or bisphosphonate therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Stability of FixationTimepoint: At baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Complication RateTimepoint: 2 days, 1 week, 4 week, 3 months, 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Maitry Negi

Faculty of Dental Science, Dharmsinh Desai University

hirenpatel.fods@ddu.ac.in9426034400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026