Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure using i-Gel in blind technique vs video laryngoscope technique in paediatric patients undergoing Laparoscopic surgeries

Comparison of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure using i-Gel in Blind Technique Versuss Video Laryngoscope in Paediatric Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomised Control Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/01/079725

Enrollment

Registered

2025-01-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Video laryngoscope assisted iGel placement: In the intervention group i-Gel Supraglottic airway is placed using a Video laryngoscope during intubation process for confirmation of positi

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Pediatric patients within a defined age range, typically from 1 year to 10 years old. 2. ASA I and II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Suspected difficult airway. 2. Previous abdominal surgeries. 3. Any comorbidities that would affect time under anesthesia, intragastric pressure and abdominal pressure. 4. Weight of less than 5 kg.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure using i-Gel in blind technique vs video laryngoscope assisted placement.Timepoint: 03 Minutes after i-Gel placement	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Peak pressure before and after pneumoperitoneum 2. Number of attempts 3. Insertion time Timepoint: Intraoperative	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSRIRAM

Army Institute of Cardio thoracic Sciences

joe21sf@gmail.com9599699348

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026