To compare recovery time from anaesthesia through different techniques

TO COMPARE POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANAESTHESIA (Tiva) USING TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSION SYSTEM (TCI) AND CONVENTIONAL INTERMITTENT BOLUS TECHNIQUE - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/01/079631

Enrollment

Registered

2025-01-28

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N979- Female infertility, unspecified Health Condition 2: N80-N98- Noninflammatory disorders of female genital tract

Interventions

Intervention1: Total Intravenous Anaesthesia using Target Controlled Infusion System: Total Intravenous Anaesthesia using Target Controlled Infusion System Duration- less than 30 minutes Frequency: on

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All patient undergoing short gynecological procedures in ASA I and II 2. Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with BMI more than 30 kg per metre square 2. Allergy to propofol

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare time and quality of post operative recovery in patients undergoing Total Intravenous Anaesthesia using Target Controlled Infusion system as compared to conventional Intermittent Bolus TechniqueTimepoint: 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Total Drug(Propofol) used intra operatively in either technique 2. Periods of apnea/hypoxia in either technique Timepoint: 12 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHimani Chauhan

Command Hospital Air Force Bangalore

adityasapra@gmail.com7895711136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026