Skip to content

Comparative analysis of balance between non diabetic and diabetic individuals with single leg loss below knee using artificial limb during turning and climbing steps

Comparative analysis of balance between non diabetic and diabetic individuals with Unilateral Transtibial Amputation using Endoskeletal Prosthesis during turning and negotiating steps. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/01/079327
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-01-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S881- Traumatic amputation at level between knee and ankle

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Vaibhav Dolas
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Two groups Group I Persons with Non Diabetic unilateral Transtibial amputation using PTB endoskeletal prosthesis. Group II Persons with Diabetic Unilateral Transtibial amputation using PTB endoskeletal prosthesis. 2. Functional level K3 (K- level functional assessment scale) 3. Persons using prosthesis for more than 3 months. 4. Persons ambulating independently without any walking aid.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Amputees with a stump length of less than 1/3 rd and more than 2/3 rd of the unaffected leg 2. Any clinical manifestation or condition which will affect the performance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. STEP/QUICK TURN (SQT) - Turn time & Turn sway velocity 2. STEP UP/OVER (SUO) - Rising index (force to rise) movement time and impact index (impact force)Timepoint: Only baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVaibhav Dolas

AIIPMR, Mumbai

vsdolas21@gmail.com9820384812

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026