Checking two gels healing after gingivectomy with and without laser.

Comparison of efficacy of Beta-sitosterol gel Vs Hyaluronic acid gel topical application with low level laser therapy on Gingivectomy wound healing an interventional parallel arm study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/01/079261

Enrollment

Registered

2025-01-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K051- Chronic gingivitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Group-I: Group B: External bevel gingivectomy + 0.25% Beta-sitosterol gel applied topically + LLLT : 21 days Intervention2: Group-II: Group D: External bevel gingivectomy + 0.2%Hyaluro

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inflammatory type gingival enlargement more than 2mm Mc Gaw Index Adequate amount of keratinized tissue

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemic diseases and drugs Pregnant and lactating Smokers Infrabony pockets Poor oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Will wound healing be better in 0.25% Beta-sitosterol Gel over 0.2% hyaluronic acid gel Timepoint: Base line to twenty one days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Will low level laser therapy with 0.25% Beta-sitosterol Gel or 0.2% hyaluronic acid gel show better healing than 0.25% Beta-sitosterol Gel or 0.2% hyaluronic acid gel application alone Timepoint: Base line to twenty one days	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSriramula naga sai bhavana

Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences and Research centre

dr.manasa5986@gmail.com9949727898

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026