FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of endotracheal intubation through two different supraglottic airway devices with fiberoptic guidance

Comparison of endotracheal intubation through BlockBuster® versus Fastrach® LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) with fiberoptic guidance

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/01/079214
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-01-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Endotracheal intubation through Fastrach® LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) with fiberoptic guidance: Ease of endotracheal intubation through Fastrach® LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) with fibe

Sponsors

BARC hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (age: 18-60yrs). Patients with ASA physical status I to III. Patients with adequate mouth opening of at least 3cms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Oropharyngeal pathology Morbid obesity Pregnancy Patients with gastroesophageal reflux

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for intubation and ease of tracheal intubationTimepoint: minutes, seconds—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time taken for LMA placement. 2. Ease of insertion of LMA. 3. Time required for removal of LMA. 4. Blood on laryngeal mask airway and sore throat. Timepoint: minutes, seconds—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rudhra Jayachandran

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Hospital

ksdalal@barc.gov.in9821577175

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026