FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Tramadol hydrochloride local infilteration and lignocaine hydrochloride local infilteration in anterior maxillary region to find out which anesthesing has less pain score while extracting teeth.

Tramadol hydrochloride vs lignocaine hydrochloride in the extraction of anterior teeth - comparative study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/01/079179
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-01-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: 5% Tramadol hydrochloride: To evaluate the efficacy of tramadol as local anesthetic agent given as an infilteration at the time of extraction. Control Intervention1: 2% lignocaine hydro

Sponsors

Srishti Agarwal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients requiring extraction of one or more maxillary anterior teeth and providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known allergies to lignocaine or tramadol, those with significant medical conditions contraindicating dental extractions, pregnant or lactating women, and patients on medications that could interfere with pain perception or local anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain with VAS scoreTimepoint: At baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Onset of anesthesia in minutesTimepoint: At baseline;Amount of anesthesia administered in number of vialsTimepoint: At baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSrishti Agarwal

Saveetha dental college and hospital

Sivachandru93@gmail.com9874516410

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026