FindTrial
Sign In

Importance of second look endoscopy in patients of GI Bleed after normal endoscopy and colonoscopy: A prospective study.

Importance of second look endoscopy in patients of potential small bowel bleed : A prospective observational study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/01/079022
Enrollment
121
Registered
2025-01-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K922- Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

IPGMER and SSKM Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients of potential small bowel GI bleed will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with standard contraindications for UGIE will be exluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients in whom small bowel evaluation could have been avoidedTimepoint: at 12 month.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total Procedure Rates: Number of interventions needed to diagnose etiology of GI Bleed. Transfusion Rate: Number of units of blood transfusion needed prior to diagnose etiology of GI Bleed. Recurrence Rate: Number of episodes of GI Bleed over a follow-up period of 6-12 months. Obscure GI Bleed prevalence: Number of patients not found to have a source of bleeding after standard upper & lower endoscopic examinations, small bowel evaluation with VCE and/or enteroscopy, & radiographic testing Timepoint: 12 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abdullah

IPGMER and SSKM

dockdas@gmail.com9830349787

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026