Comparison of cotton sleeved disposal applicator with available synthetic sable hair brush for chemical peeling .

Development and Comparison of cotton sleeved disposal applicator with available synthetic sable hair brush for chemical peeling . - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/12/078753

Enrollment

Registered

2024-12-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L818- Other specified disorders of pigmentation

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparison of cotton sleeved disposal applicator with available synthetic sable hair brush for chemical peeling .: Objective is Effectiveness, safety , ease of use , cost effectiveness

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Participants aged 18years and above . 2.Induviduals seeking chemical peeling for skin rejuvenation or specific dermatological conditions like acne , dyspigmentation for participation in the study . 3.Participants with Fitzpatrick skin types I TO IV . 4. Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with a history of allergic reactions to chemical peeling agents . 2. Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding 3.Induviduals with active skin infections ,wounds , or lesion at the treatment site . 4.Patients with a history of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring. 5. Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions that may interfere with the safety or efficacy of chemical peeling procedures . 6.Induviduals currently using oral or topical retinoids ,corticosteroids or ,other medications that may affect skin sensitivity or response to chemical peeling

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.Uniformity of Chemical Peeling , which is the consistency of chemical peel application and evenness of skin exfoliation and Assessment Tool includes Clinical photography and evaluation by blinded dermatologists or assessors. 2.Skin Improvement in skin texture, tone, or reduction in specific conditions (e.g., acne scars, pigmentation) and Assessment Tool includes Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or validated scoring systems like the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale or Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI). Timepoint: 1.Baseline (pre-peel). 2.Follow-ups at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks post-procedure.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.Uniformity of Chemical Peeling , which is the consistency of chemical peel application and evenness of skin exfoliation and Assessment Tool includes Clinical photography and evaluation by blinded dermatologists or assessors. 2.Skin Improvement in skin texture, tone, or reduction in specific conditions (e.g., acne scars, pigmentation) and Assessment Tool includes Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or validated scoring systems like the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale or Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI). Timepoint: 1.Baseline (pre-peel). 2.Follow-ups at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks post-procedure.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Safety and Adverse Events 2.Patient Satisfaction 3.Ease of Applicator Use 4.Cost-EffectivenessTimepoint: 1.Immediately post-application. 2.At follow-ups (Day 7, Day 14, and 3 weeks) and end of the study .	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pavithra H

Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, SIMATS, Chennai .

drsukeshgautam@gmail.com9715686909

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026