Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose vs. Iron Isomaltoside in Moderate to Severe Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Prospective, Randomised Study

Comparison of efficacy and safety of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus intravenous iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe iron deficiency anemia: A prospective, randomized, open-labelled, active controlled study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/12/078707
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-12-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: D509- Iron deficiency anemia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Iron (III) isomaltoside 1000: dose 1g schedule single dose strength 10ml of 100mg/ml drug to be administered brand name FerUno manufacturer ZYDUS route intravenous slow infusion Cont

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Nagpur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male and female patients aged between 18 to 65 years inclusive of both, will be included. Additionally, hemoglobin values should be greater than 6.5g/dl and less than 10g/dl, body weight should be more than 50kg, there should be a history of unresponsiveness or intolerance to oral iron therapy for at least one month before enrolment in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: acute bleeding of more than 500ml in the past 72 hours, anemia caused predominantly by factors other than iron deficiency as decided by the investigator, known hypersensitivity to any component of ferric carboxymaltose or iron (III) isomaltoside 1000, history of hemochromatosis or any iron overload states, received intravenous iron treatment 30 days prior to enrolment in the study, received treatment with erythropoietin or erythropoietin-stimulation agents, red blood cell transfusion, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy 30 days prior to enrolment in the study, raised alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase 3 or more times above the upper limit of normal, pregnant and lactating women, history of hemoglobinopathies, thalassemia, bleeding manifestations, patients requiring dialysis, documented history of malignancy, patients with psychiatric disorders, patients not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The change in mean value of hemoglobin at the end of 4 weeks after administration of study drug will be the primary efficacy outcome of the studyTimepoint: 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in the mean value of iron profile (serum iron, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, TIBC) at the end of 4 weeks after administration of study drug will be the secondary efficacy outcome of the studyTimepoint: 4 weeks;Adverse events occurring during the study period will be used to assess the safety outcomesTimepoint: day 0 to day 28

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nandini N A

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Nagpur

nandinisastry6@gmail.com8151893392

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026