FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare two methods of sealing the tube in windpipe during course of anaesthesia in patients undergoing major cancer surgeries

Comparing Conventional Endotracheal Cuff Inflation to Commercially Available Syringe Device: A Randomised Open Label Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/12/078699
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-12-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Novel Cuffsure device Endotracheal cuff inflation: Intervention group involves usage of specialised inflation syringe (Cuffsure device), in which endotracheal cuff inflation will procee

Sponsors

Tata Memorial Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients above 18 years of age 2. Patients posted for elective onco surgeries 3. Procedures requiring orotracheal intubation using single lumen endotracheal tube in OR

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Refusal of consent 2. Patients requiring nasotracheal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy of endotracheal intracuff pressures as inflated using conventional technique vs use of commercially available cuff inflation syringe.Timepoint: Immediately after insertion of endotracheal tube—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of overinflation & underinflation of the endotracheal cuff using the conventional method vs commercially available cuff inflation syringeTimepoint: 1 minute after the pilot balloon is connected to the pressure transducer at the beginning—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sharanya M

Tata Memorial Centre

aparnasanjay@hotmail.com9322243936

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026