Skip to content

analgesic effect of conventional radio frequency vs pulsed radio frequency lesioning of glossopharyngeal nerve in patients of oropharyngeal cancer

Comparative study between analgesic effect of conventional radio frequency vs pulsed radio frequency lesioning of glossopharyngeal nerve in patients of oropharyngeal cancer suffering from orofacial pain - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/12/078583
Enrollment
110
Registered
2024-12-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C109- Malignant neoplasm of oropharynx,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Glossopharyngeal nerve in patients having glossopharyngeal neuralgia suffering from oropharyngeal cancer using vas scale at time 1 day 1 week 2 week 1 month 3 month and 6 month post pro

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient in the age group of 18 to 60 years of either gender diagnosed with Oropharyngeal cancer with GPN All patients who failed pharmacotherapy or intolerable side effects of medication; at least 6 month of follow-up recordings.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with bilateral GPN; Patients with incomplete medical records (lack of baseline data or postoperative follow-up data), Patients with idiopathic GPN.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare analgesic effect of conventionl vs pulsed radio frequency lesioning of glossopharyngeal nerve in patients having glossopharyngeal neuralgia suffering from oropharyngeal cancer using vas scale at time 1 day 1 week 2 week 1 month 3 month and 6 month post procedure.Timepoint: To compare analgesic effect of conventionl vs pulsed radio frequency lesioning of glossopharyngeal nerve in patients having glossopharyngeal neuralgia suffering from oropharyngeal cancer using vas scale at time 1 day 1 week 2 week 1 month 3 month and 6 month post procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare side effects of conventional vs pulsed radio frequency lesioning in between two groups. To assess the satisfaction among two groups using the likert scaleTimepoint: 1 day 1 week 2 week 1 month 3 month and 6 month post procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactProf Sarita Singh

King Georges Medical University Lucknow

saritacsmmu@rediffmail.com9415520080

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026