Skip to content

A Comparative Assessment of Closed versus Open (Transparotid) Treatment in Managing Unilateral Condylar Neck or Subcondylar Fractures, with or without Parasymphysis Involvement: A Randomized Clinical Study

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CLOSED AND OPEN (TRANSPAROTID) TREATMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF UNILATERAL CONDYLAR NECK OR SUBCONDYLAR FRACTURES WITH OR WITHOUT PARASYMPHYSIS FRACTURE: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY. - NILL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/12/078576
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-12-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S026- Fracture of mandible

Interventions

Intervention1: open reduction of condylar fracture through transparotid approach: COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN FRACTURE REDUCTION AND CLOSED FRACTURE REDUCTION FOR 18 MONTHS Control Intervention1: closed r

Sponsors

Shivam Shukla
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient aged more than 18 years. 2. Patient with unilateral condylar fracture with or without parasymphysis fracture. 3. In the posteroanterior aspect of the mandible, the degree of deviation between the condylar fragment and the ascending ramus is between 10° and 45°, either laterally or medially, with a vertical ramus height shortening of 2–15 mm. 4. The patient must have a good complement of teeth especially posterior teeth. 5. Patient should give consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous history of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. 2. Severe pretraumatic dysgnathia. 3. Patient with condylar head fracture. 4. Insufficient dentition to reproduce normal occlusion. 5. All medically compromised patients. 6. Associated midface fractures. 7. Pregnant women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The present study will evaluate and compare the management of condylar fracture with ORIF through transparotid approach and CRMMF. This study will help in identifying treatment with less pain, discomfort and less facial asymmetry Timepoint: 6 MONTHS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
? The study result will be helpful in clinical application of condylar fractures management and can also be used for further researchTimepoint: 6 MONTHS

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShivam Shukla

Government Dental college Raipur

mishra.biswajit08@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026