Skip to content

Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic management in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Effectiveness of Median Nerve Mobilization versus Dry Needling in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Housemaids and Housewives - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/12/077884
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-12-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G560- Carpal tunnel syndrome

Interventions

Intervention1: Dry Needling: Position: The patient lies supine with the forearm supinated and supported by a pillow for comfort. The therapist, seated beside the patient, ensures clear access to the f

Sponsors

Nikita Priya
Lead Sponsor
Dr Sanjib Kumar Das
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Participants must have a clinical diagnosis of CTS confirmed by a healthcare professional (mild to moderate CTS) 2. Participants should be between 18 and 50 years old. 3. Must be housemaids or housewives engaged in regular household activities (involving repetitive wrist movements). 4. Participants should have been experiencing symptoms of CTS for at least 3 months. 5. Participants must be willing to provide informed consent and adhere to the study protocol, including attending all treatment sessions and follow-up evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Participants who have undergone surgical intervention for CTS (e.g., carpal tunnel release surgery) are excluded. 2. Participants who were involved in any other economically productive occupation other than housework (industries, home-based workshop, etc). 3. Presence of other neurological conditions that could interfere with the study results (e.g., cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy). 4. Participants with severe comorbidities (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, thyroid, uncontrolled diabetes) 5. Pregnant women are excluded due to potential changes in fluid dynamics and risk factors. 6. Participants who have received corticosteroid injections for CTS within the last 3 months 7. Participants with contraindications to dry needling, such as bleeding disorders, needle phobia, or local skin infections, are excluded. 8. Participants with severe CTS, as indicated by significant muscle atrophy, loss of dexterity, or non-responsiveness to conservative treatments, are excluded. 9. Participants currently undergoing other treatments for CTS, such as alternative physiotherapy techniques, massage, ultrasound etc or participants who have already received physiotherapeutic treatment for CTS within the last 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain level, Symptom severity, Functional statusTimepoint: 1. Baseline assessment - before the intervention 2. Follow-up assessment - after every session 3. Final assessment- after 4th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sanjib Kumar Das

Department of Physiotherapy, Amity Institute of Health Allied Sciences

skdas@amity.edu8879485847

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026