Comparison between computer controlled injection and conventional technique in its efficacy for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

To compare Computer controlled injection Technique with Conventional Technique for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in its efficacy - A Randomized Clinical Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/12/077696

Enrollment

Registered

2024-12-05

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K010- Embedded teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: conventional injection : conventional technique in inferior alveolar nerve block Intervention2: Computer controlled injection technique: computer controlled injection technique for inf

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who require tooth extraction on both sides. Both men & women Age between 20-60

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients suffering from systemic illness predisposing them to immunocompromised state (Diabetes Mellitus, long – term steroid therapy, hemostatic alterations) Pregnant Patients Patient with acute infectious conditions in the oral cavity Poor oral hygiene Patient on analgesics Patient allergic to lignocaine

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Computer-controlled injection Technique has less pain on injection when compared with conventional Technique for Inferior Alveolar nerve block.Timepoint: Baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
nilTimepoint: nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSajesh

Sree Mookambika Institute of Dental Science

sajeshnair79@yahoo.co.in9486941236

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026