FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of new and old technique of circumcision

Comparison between outcomes of the conventional dorsal slit technique vs the sleeve technique for circumcision-A Randomised Control Trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/12/077693
Enrollment
52
Registered
2024-12-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Sleeve Technique: Cases of Phimosis will be treated Sleeve Technique Control Intervention1: Dorsal Slit Technique: Patient Wil be Treated by Dorsal Slit Technique

Sponsors

Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.All patient posted for circumcision for various medical indication. 2.Patient undergoing circumcisionfor religious purpose by this technique.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Carcinoma penis. 2.hypospadiasis 3.Bleeding disorders. 4.Patient not willing to participate in study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
outcomes of both techniques will be compared for operative time, introperative bleeding ,post operative pain ,requirement of analgesia ,post operative infection.Timepoint: assessment will be done at 1 week , 2 weeks and 6 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NA—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Darshana totte

Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education and Reseach

drtotedarshana@gmai.com9923129974

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026