Comparison of intervention with two medical devices in participants

A prospective randomized comparative study between clinical efficacy of miller laryngoscope lade and macintosh laryngoscope blade in adult patients with predicted normal airway undergoing elective surgery - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/11/077380

Enrollment

Registered

2024-11-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Insertion of laryngoscope blade: To compare clinical efficacy of Macintosh and Miller laryngoscope blades Control Intervention1: Miller laryngoscope blade: Miller blade is a thin straig

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 and 2 patients Age 18 to 65 years of either gender Predicted normal airway on PAC Patients scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing any airway surgeries Edentulous patients Patients with narrow mouth opening Patients having any severe systemic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of direct laryngoscopy, glottic view, and rate of successful endotracheal interventionTimepoint: At baseline , at 1 minute , at 2 minute at 3 minute and at 5 minute	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Haemodynamic parameters and complications, if anyTimepoint: After one minute, three minutes, five minutes, 10 minutes post intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr VIpin Kumar Dhama

Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial Medical College Meerut Uttar Pradesh India 250004

drvipindhama@yahoo.com9760014177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026