FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine versus nebulised lignocaine in attenuation of pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine versus nebulised lignocaine in reducing of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation - Nebulised dexmed

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/11/077341
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-11-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Airway block: We compare airway block with nebulised dexmedetomidine in reducing intubation response Control Intervention1: Nebulised dexmedetomidine: We compare airway block with nebul

Sponsors

Dr Sowmya S P
Lead Sponsor
Dr Bhargavi Sanket
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASAI, II, patients willing to give consent, posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Allergy to drugs , systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Effect of both drug in reducing hemodynamic responseTimepoint: Effect of both drug in reducing hemodynamic response—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To look for side effects associated with both the drugsTimepoint: Like cough, numbness of throat and bradycardia in postoperative period—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhargavi Sanket

Bangalore medical college and research institute

sowmyasp262@mail.com8792213141

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026