Skip to content

Comparison of the two techniques of Costoclavicular block used for pain relief after hand surgery in children

Comparison of Ultrasound guided out-of-plane vs in-plane Costoclavicular block approach in children undergoing unilateral upper extremity surgery- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/11/077084
Enrollment
52
Registered
2024-11-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M249- Joint derangement, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: IP-In plane approach of costoclavicular block : IP-Under USG guidance 0.3 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine injected after intermittent negative aspiration for blood for costoclavicular block

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children between 2 to 10 years of age 2. Scheduled for unilateral surgery of elbow, forearm, wrist or hand under general anesthesia 3. ASA physical status I/II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients requiring simultaneous contralateral upper extremity surgery or skin/bone grafting 2. Preexisting neurological deficit 3. History of previous surgery or trauma at the block area 4. Local site infection 5. H/O known allergy to local anaesthetics 6. Bleeding diathesis 7. Refusal of consent/assent 8. ASA physical status III/IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the mean needling time in out-of-plane and in-plane approaches of ultrasound guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries in paediatric patients aged 2 to 10 years. Timepoint: At time points 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 minutes during the performance of ultrasound guided costoclavicular block

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the ease of needling between the two groups Timepoint: At time points 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 minutes during performance of ultrasound guided costoclavicular block ;To compare number of skin punctures between the two groupsTimepoint: At time points 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 minutes during performance of ultrasound guided costoclavicular block ;To compare the number of needle manipulations to obtain a complete local anaesthetic spread between the two groupsTimepoint: At time points 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 minutes during performance of ultrasound guided costoclavicular block ;To compare the success rate that is absence of increase in heart rate or blood pressure more than 20 percent from baseline during skin incision between the two groupsTimepoint: At time points 15,20,25,30 minutes during performance of ultrasound guided costoclavicular block ;To compare the postoperative pain scores between the two groupsTimepoint: In PACU on arrival,5mins,30mins,2hrs,6hrs after arrival to the postoperative room;To compare the duration of postoperative analgesia between the two groupsTimepoint: In PACU at time points 15,30,45,60,75,90 minutes & every 15 minutes till 6hrs postoperatively.;To compare the complications between the two groupsTimepoint: At time points 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 minutes during performance of costoclavicular block through intraoperative period,in postoperative period every 15minutes till 6hrs.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRajashree Deka

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

shreyabs@hotmail.com9892652781

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026