Comparison of Spinal versus General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic surgeries

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Regional versus General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Gynecological and Surgical Procedures - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/11/076927

Enrollment

Registered

2024-11-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Spinal anesthesia: bupivacaine 0.5% heavy with Buprenorphine Clonidine Control Intervention1: general anesthesia: Propofol Vecuronium opioids

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients of ASA grade I and II, undergoing laparoscopic surgical and gynaecological surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with the following conditions will be excluded cardiac diseases IHD CAD respiratory diseases COPD ILD Asthma neuropsychiatric disorders Obese patients Obstructive sleep apnea Difficult airway and intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Better pain scores stable hemodynamic parameters comfort level and sedation scores with regional anaesthesiaTimepoint: regular intervals intra operatively and post operatively	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
duration of analgesia early mobilization early discharge from hospitalTimepoint: end operative 6hr 12hr 24hr postop	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shirley Stephen

Rajiv Gandhi institute of Medical Sciences Adilabad Telangana

shirley81@rediffmail.com9371231434

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026