To find out the pain and discomfort after giving crown by two different technique Halls technique vs Conventional technique

Assessment of post-operative discomfort and effect on occlusion after placing Stainless Steel Crown by Halls technique vs Conventional technique: A Randomised Control Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/11/076900

Enrollment

Registered

2024-11-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: HALLS TECHNIQUE: 3M Stainless steel crown placement without tooth preparation in the carious teeth having ICDAS score 4 and 5. Assessment of pain and occlusal discomfort for period of 1

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: I. Cooperative Children of age between 4-8 years with Frankle Rating 3 and 4. II. First/Second deciduous molar teeth with occlusal and proximal caries diagnosed using the International Caries Detection, and Assessment System (ICDAS) with criteria codes 4 and 5 III. Tooth with no symptom of pain. IV. Fully erupted tooth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: I. Any signs or symptoms of pulpal or periapical pathology. II. Medically compromised Children. III. Uncooperative children. IV. Inadequate crown structure unable to retain the crown. V. Bruxism VI. Tooth with abnormal mobility

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. To assess the presence of patient discomfort, and pain in the tooth and Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) after placing Stainless Steel Crown (SSC) using Hall technique versus Conventional technique. 2. To evaluate effects on occlusion such as overbite, midline deviations, and intraoral Occluso-vertical dimension. Timepoint: Clinical parameters will be evaluated at pre-op, immediate post-op, day after, 1st week, 2nd week, 3rd week, and 4th week post-operatively or at weekly intervals till occlusal settlement. Then at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To assess the presence of patient discomfort, and pain in the tooth and Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) after placing Stainless Steel Crown (SSC) using Hall technique versus Conventional technique. 2. To evaluate effects on occlusion such as overbite, midline deviations, and intraoral Occluso-vertical dimension. Timepoint: Clinical parameters will be evaluated at pre-op, immediate post-op, day after, 1st week, 2nd week, 3rd week, and 4th week post-operatively or at weekly intervals till occlusal settlement. Then at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To assess the marginal adaptability of the SSC crown using an Intraoral Periapical (IOPA) Radiograph. 2. To evaluate the treatment time for placing SSC in both Halls & Conventional techniques. 3. To evaluate the gingival health after SSC crown placement. Timepoint: Marginal adaptability will be assessed using an IOPA X-ray immediately post-op. Loe & Silness Gingival index will evaluate gingival health preoperatively, baseline,after 1day, 1 week, 2nd week, 3rd week, 4th week, 3,6,and 12 month	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To assess the marginal adaptability of the SSC crown using an Intraoral Periapical (IOPA) Radiograph. 2. To evaluate the treatment time for placing SSC in both Halls & Conventional techniques. 3. To evaluate the gingival health after SSC crown placement. Timepoint: Marginal adaptability will be assessed using an IOPA X-ray immediately post-op. Loe & Silness Gingival index will evaluate gingival health preoperatively, baseline,after 1day, 1 week, 2nd week, 3rd week, 4th week, 3,6,and 12 month

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ashok kumar

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar.

ashok.dentistry@aiimsdeoghar.edu.in9971903750

Outcome results