None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Control Intervention1: To evaluate and compare Omnichroma (One shade Universal Composite) and Fusion (Universal Nanohybrid Composite) in-vivo using modified USPHS Criteria and after artificial ageing
Sponsors
Dr Pradnya V Bansode
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1)patients with atleast two non carious small and shallow cervical abrasions in maxillary premolars. 2)Good Oral Hygiene. 3) Patients willing to participate in the study and co-operate during the study tenure.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: (a) Poor oral hygiene (b) Severe or active periodontal disease. (c) Caries and lack of compliance. (d) Non vital teeth (e) Fractured or visibly cracked teeth (1) Patient will be excluded if the patient withdraws or opts out of study before 12 months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparative evaluation of One Shade Universal Composite resin and Universal Nanohybrid composite resin using digital VITA Shade Guide & modified USPHS criterion to evaluate - 1) marginal discoloration 2) marginal integrity 3) surface texture 4) wear 5) postoperative sensitivity 6) recurrent caries Timepoint: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Invitro Comparative evaluation of One Shade Universal Composite Resin and Universal Nanohybrid Composite Resin after preparation of 80 resin discs each of both the materials. Shade, surface roughness and microhardness will be evaluated and comparedTimepoint: Thermocycling of composite resin discs will be done to create artificial ageing. Values will be recorded at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactPradnya V Bansode Wadikar
Govt Dental College And Hospital Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar
Outcome results
None listed