Skip to content

Comparison of fentanyl and magnesium added to levobupivacaine heavy for spinal anaesthesia in lower limb surgeries

Comparison of the effect of intrathecal fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5 per cent for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries A prospective randomised study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/11/076851
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-11-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S720- Fracture of head and neck of femur Health Condition 2: S723- Fracture of shaft of femur Health Condition 3: S724- Fracture of lower end of femur Health Condition 4: S721- Pertrochanteric fracture Health Condition 5: S870- Crushing injury of knee Health Condition 6: S878- Crushing injury of lower leg Health Condition 7: S820- Fracture of patella Health Condition 8: S821- Fracture of upper end of tibia Health Condition 9: S822- Fracture of shaft of tibia Health Condition

Interventions

Intervention1: levobupivacaine: levobupivacaine heavy 0.5 % 3 ml + normal saline Control Intervention1: Levobupivacaine + Fentanyl: Levobupivacaine heavy 0.5 % 3 ml + Fentanyl 25 mcg Control Intervent

Sponsors

Gajra Raja Medical College and Jay Arogya Group of Hospitals
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients consenting to participate in the study, aged between 18-60 years, of both sexes, of ASA grade I or II, admitted to undergo lower limb orthopaedic procedures in our institute were included in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients declining consent, aged less than 18 or greater than 60 years, ASA grades III or IV, suffering from any respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, renal, neurological or coagulation disorder, pregnant or already receiving opioid or magnesium therapy or having any local infection at the site of injection of spinal anaesthesia were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesiaTimepoint: onset of sensory and motor blockade at baseline duration of sensory blockade when the spinal block regresses till S1 (in minutes) duration of motor block till time of first mobilisation (in minutes) duration of analgesia until the patient requests rescue analgesia at VAS score greater than 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
haemodynamic parametersTimepoint: baseline, intraoperative intervals predefined at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 & 150 minutes;side effectsTimepoint: in the postoperative period

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnusha Tripathy

Gajra Raja Medical College

dr.neelimatandon21@gmail.com9826215586

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026