video vs direct laryngoscopy by novice intubators

Comparison of video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation by novice intubators in operation theater - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/11/076847

Enrollment

Registered

2024-11-14

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Video Laryngoscopy: endotracheal intubation Control Intervention1: Direct Laryngoscopy: endotracheal intubation

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Elective Surgery Fasting patients ASA status I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency Surgery Non Fasting ASA III and above

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Intubation success first attempt success number of attempts Time duration of intubationTimepoint: 10 Minutes	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
number of esophageal intubation cormack Lehane grade Percentage of glottis opening score Use of optimization maneuvers ease of use Vas scale ease of use likert scale ComplicationsTimepoint: 10 Minutes	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kiran S

Base Hospital Delhi Cantt

drkirans@gmail.com9810841725

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026