Skip to content

To Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the GOODAIR 2.0 Non-Electric Car Air Purifier in mitigating motion sickness in individuals engaged in daily car travel

A randomized, double blinded study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the GOODAIR 2.0 Non-Electric Car Air Purifier in comparison with placebo Non-Electric Car Air Purifier in mitigating motion sickness in individuals engaged in daily car travel

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/11/076509
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-11-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Team Green Innovations Private Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with significant history of motion sickness while traveling in car

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects suffering from head injuries, infections and other diseases of the ear and neurological systems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the effectiveness of the GOODAIR 2.0 non-electric car air purifier in minimizing motion sickness and its associated symptoms in individuals who travel by car on a daily basisTimepoint: 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Analyse the safety of GOODAIR 2.0 Non-electric car air purifierTimepoint: 1 Month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shyam Mukundan

Lakshmi Nursing Home

drshyammukundan@gmail.com04842625369

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026