Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1 Dental Condition: The presence of good oral hygiene. 2 Patients with extended posterior edentulous mandibular areas, encompassing a minimum of two missing teeth ie 36/37 or 46/47 3 Patients willing to actively participate in the study. 4 Minimum bone height of 12mm measured from the crest of the ridge to the upper border of the inferior alveolar canal. 5 Minimum ridge thickness of 3mm, with measurements less than 5mm at the crestal region. 6 Implant sites in consideration included both compact bone and cancellous bone.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Uncontrolled systemic conditions. 2. Systemic disorders that could compromise osseointegration. 3. Use of medications, such as steroids, that could impact bone metabolism. 4 Smokers was excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary outcome used in sample size calculation reveal a moderate yet statistically significant difference favoring Group II primary stability. This signifies that the osseodensification technique would led to superior outcomes compared to the ridge splitting technique.Timepoint: The outcome will be assessed/ estimated immediately after implant placement and prosthesis will be given after 3 months. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The compelling evidence from this study would strongly support the superiority of the osseodensification technique. This preference is attributed to the techniques capacity to enhance bone density, thereby contributing to an overall improvement in implant primary stability.Timepoint: The outcome will be assessed/estimated immediately after implant placement & prosthesis will be given after 3 months. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
ACPM DENTAL COLLEGE, DHULE