Skip to content

A study comparing two types of dental implants and how they affect the surrounding bone and gum tissue: a randomized clinical trial.

A comparative in-vivo study between reverse conical neck and standard neck implants and its effect on crestal bone morphology and peri-implant soft tissue collar; a randomized clinical trail - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/076079
Enrollment
22
Registered
2024-10-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Dental implants: Reverse conical/bevel neck implants Control Intervention1: Dental Implants: standard/parallel neck implants

Sponsors

Pinipe Christina
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Posterior edentulous spaces with adequate ridge dimension for implant placement. Presence of a minimum of 2 mm of keratinized mucosa at the buccal aspects in the implant zone. Minimum crestal bone width of 5 mm and bone architecture without undercuts and presence of 1 mm of bone bucco-lingual to the planned position in a favorable prosthetic situation from pre- operative CBCT. Vertical bone height from bone crest to top of mandibular canal of 12 mm or more; a mesio-distal width of 6–10 mm . Minimum vertical distance of 5 mm from the crestal mucosa of the potential implant site to the opposing dentition. Absence of periapical pathology adjacent to the edentulous site. Patients who are motivated, highly compliant, with good oral hygiene practice.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anterior edentulous space. Presence of active periodontal disease. Patients with any systemic disease and medications that will interfere with treatment outcome. Patients with known risk factors and risk modifiers which can influence the overall outcome of treatment were excluded from the study. Pregnant and lactating women. Persons who are not surgically fit for implant placement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic crestal Bone levels around implant, Periimplant probing depthTimepoint: baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between Mucosal thickness and primary outcomesTimepoint: baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPinipe Christina

GSL dental college

anu3267@gmail.com9985313267

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026