Skip to content

A Clinical trial comparing different material and procedure in treatment of vital mature permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis and/or apical periodontitis.

Comparative evaluation of coronal pulpotomy and partial radicular pulpotomy in vital mature permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis and/or apical periodontitis using chitosan and prf(platelet rich fibrin)-A Randomized controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075830
Enrollment
48
Registered
2024-10-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Coronal pulpotomy versus partial Radicular pulpotomy using PRF(platelet Rich FIbrin): Tooth will be anaesthetized using 2% lidocaine and then isolated with a rubber dam. Caries will be

Sponsors

Faculty of Dental Sciences IMS BHU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Mature vital permanent molar 2.Possibly sensitive to percussion. 3.Strong and prolonged reaction to thermal testing, which can last for minutes. 4.Spontaneous dull pain that can be more or less suppressed by pain medication clinical diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis with/without periapical rarefaction. 5.ORSTAVIK’S PAI (periapical index) and CBCT PAI score = 3. 6.No signs of pulpal necrosis including sinus tract or swelling.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Non restorable teeth. 2.Negative response to thermal testing, the presence of sinus tract or swelling. 3.Bleeding could not be controlled after pulpotomy in 5 minutes. 4.Insufficient bleeding after pulp exposure, the pulp is judged necrotic or partially necrotic 5.Medically compromised patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decrease in visual analogue scale of pain.Timepoint: 1st,2nd,7th day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No evidence of progression of periapical pathological finding in radiograph.Timepoint: 3 ,6 ,12 months;Resolution of periapical pathology after treatment.Timepoint: 3 ,6 ,12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Deepti

Faculty of Dental Sciences IMS BHU

deeptirocks07@gmail.com9871202627

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026