FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison changes in patient confusion assessment methods in two ways of anesthetic depth monitoring. The participants involved are patients undergoing elective non-emergent surgeries. The main outcome would be the detection of delirium.

THE EFFECT OF QCON INDEX MONITORING VERSUS END TIDAL SEVOFLURANE MONITORING ON TRACHEAL EXTUBATION TIME. A COMPARATIVE STUDY. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075762
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-10-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention2: Using qCON monitor versus ETAG monitor: qCON measures depth of anesthesia and ETAG also measure depth of anesthesia

Sponsors

Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences AND HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 3 and 4 other inhalational agents emergency surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Delirium Assessment by confusion assessment method score (CAM Score)Timepoint: baseline and post-operative time zero—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ETAG Group and qCON groupTimepoint: score—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactLinah Maryam

Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences and Hospital

shikha_2527@yahoo.co.in9419184790

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026