comparison of the safety and effictiveness of three different approaches to pain relief after spine surgery

Comparative safety and efficacy of three different ultrasound guided approaches to lumbar dorsal rami for pain relief in adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery – a double blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/10/075653

Enrollment

100

Registered

2024-10-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: M479- Spondylosis, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: three different approaches to lumbar dorsal rami block: erector spinae plane block thoracolumbar interfascial plane block submultifidus block Control Intervention1: No Block: in the com

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult ASA 1 & 2 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery up to 4 levels with midline incision in prone position

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Those who refuse to participate Sensitive to local anaesthetics Liver and Kidney failure

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time from block administration to demand of first analgesia by patient after surgeryTimepoint: at 0, 4 and 12 hours after surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Total tramadol consumption within 24 hours after surgery Postoperative pain score (VAS) Quality of Recovery – 9 score Any block related complications Timepoint: at 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactParnandi Bhaskar Rao

All India Institute of medical sciences, Bhubaneswar

anaes_bhaskar@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in09438884044

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026