FindTrial
Sign In

A Study To Compare The Outcomes Between The Conventional And Modified Epigastric Port Insertion Techniques In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A Randomized Controlled Trial To Compare The Outcomes Between The Conventional And Modified Epigastric Port Insertion Techniques In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075633
Enrollment
104
Registered
2024-10-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified Epigastric port insertion: Epigastric port in this group, will be inserted under direct vision through the linea alba after making skin incision 2 finger breadth below the xiph

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the age group of 18 years and above.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Suspected malignancy 2)Pregnant patient 3)Frozen calots with or without surrounding dense adhesions 4)Patients who require CBD exploration 5)Cases that get converted to open 6)Patients with portal hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the postoperative epigastric port site pain using VAS score between the conventional and modified epigastric port insertion techniques in laparoscopic cholecystectomy Timepoint: 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the time taken for extraction of gall bladder between the modified epigastric port insertion group and conventional epigastric port group in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Timepoint: Intraoperative ;To compare the total duration of surgery between the modified epigastric port insertion group and the conventional epigastric port group in laparoscopic cholecystectomyTimepoint: Intraoperative;To compare the 30 day epigastric wound complication rate using Southampton scale between both the groups.Timepoint: Postoperative day 30—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArunkumar V

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh

dramit2411@gmail.com9891981331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026