Skip to content

Comparing the Effectiveness of Manipulation Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion, and Disability in Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative efficacy of contact manipulation v/s adjuster techniques on pain, ROM, disability with mechanical low back pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075629
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-10-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M958- Other specified acquired deformities of musculoskeletal system

Interventions

Intervention1: Contact Manipulation: High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude (HVLA) Thrust This is the most common form of manual adjustment used in chiropractic care. It involves a quick and precise force appli

Sponsors

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed with MLBP by a healthcare professional. No previous spinal surgery or contraindications to spinal adjustments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-mechanical causes of low back pain. Severe comorbidities affecting mobility. Pregnant women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VASTimepoint: Baseline, 4th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Oswestry Disability IndexTimepoint: Baseline, 4th week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sharath Hullumani V

Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College

raghuneuro@yahoo.com8126506769

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026