Skip to content

Comparison of treatment results of functional appliances versus tooth extraction in patients

Comparison of treatment outcomes of functional appliances versus extraction protocol in Skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion patients: A prospective clinical trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075587
Enrollment
26
Registered
2024-10-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: After levelling and alignment, Forsus Fatigue Resistant device installed in Skeletal Class II div 1 patients till desired position of mandible is achiev

Sponsors

Dr. Sharvari Mairal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion Angle’s Class II molar relationship Both male and female patients Minimal or no crowding in the mandibular arch and maxillary arch Overjet [7-10mm] No extracted or missing permanent teeth • Post-pubertal phase of skeletal development CVMI (5 and 6) • No medical history or systemic disease that could affect normal growth of the body or jaws • No presence of any craniofacial syndrome • No previous orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Malocclusion other than Class II div 1 malocclusion Previous orthodontic treatment Patients having any Systemic disease or craniofacial syndromes Temporomandibular dysfunction Extracted or missing permanent tooth/teeth Any facial asymmetry • Presence of any parafunctional habits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes in Class II division 1 patients undergoing maxillary premolar extractions and Forsus Fatigue Resistant deviceTimepoint: At baseline, after 4 months, after 10 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effectivity of Forsus Fatigue-Resistant deviceTimepoint: After 6 months of installation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sharvari Mairal

Banaras Hindu University

vipulk.sharma1@bhu.ac.in9389460640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026