Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices, I-Gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway- Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway- Protector for giving anaesthesia

Comparative efficacy of I-Gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway-Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Protector in Short Surgical Procedures under General Anaesthesia with Spontaneous Ventilation - A Randomised Clinical Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/10/075505

Enrollment

120

Registered

2024-10-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH SPONTANEOUS VENTILATION USING SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICES: Comparison of induction for short surgical procedures (less than 1.5 hours) viz. I-Gel, LMA SUPREME an

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grading I ,II Patients undergoing elective short surgeries less than 1.5hrs under general anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non Consenting Patient BMI more than 30Kg/m2 Difficult airway MPC Class =3 Uncontrolled Co-morbid illness H/O GERD, Hiatus Hernia Musculo-skeletal Abnormalities Like Cervical Spine Deformities Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the efficacy of I-Gel, LMA Supreme, and LMA Protector in maintaining a patent airway during short surgical procedures.Timepoint: Baseline(To) 1 min after insertion T1 3 min T2 5 min T3 15 min T4 30 min T5 45 min T6 60 min T7 75 min T8 90 min T9 105min T10	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate the insertion characteristics, including ease and success rates, of the three supraglottic airway devices. To assess safety parameters, such as seal pressures and incidence of complications, associated with I-Gel, LMA Supreme, and LMA Protector. To analyze and compare hemodynamic stability and oxygenation levels achieved with each device during general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation Timepoint: Baseline(To) 1 min after insertion T1 3 min T2 5 min T3 15 min T4 30 min T5 45 min T6 60 min T7 75 min T8 90 min T9 105min T10	—

Measure

Time frame

To evaluate the insertion characteristics, including ease and success rates, of the three supraglottic airway devices. To assess safety parameters, such as seal pressures and incidence of complications, associated with I-Gel, LMA Supreme, and LMA Protector. To analyze and compare hemodynamic stability and oxygenation levels achieved with each device during general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation Timepoint: Baseline(To) 1 min after insertion T1 3 min T2 5 min T3 15 min T4 30 min T5 45 min T6 60 min T7 75 min T8 90 min T9 105min T10

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDamandeep Kaur

Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research

drmmprao@gmail.com8699943250

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026