Skip to content

Cooled Radiofrequency ablation vs. Conventional Radiofrequency ablation in patients with chronic low back pain of discogenic origin

Comparison of clinico-radiological outcome of Cooled Radiofrequency ablation vs. Conventional Radiofrequency ablation in patients with chronic low back pain of discogenic origin- A single blinded randomized control trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075393
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-10-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M464- Discitis, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Radiofrequency ablation: conventional radiofrequency ablation for basivertebral nerve block Control Intervention1: radiofrequency ablation: Cooled radiofrequency ablation for basiverteb

Sponsors

All India Institute of medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient with age > 18 years 2. Patient with chronic axial low back pain whose pain increase on forward flexion, sitting and prolonged standing. 3. Above patients with black lumbar disc on MRI. 4. Above patients with MODIC changes of Grade 1 or 2 on MRI. 5. Patient who has given consent for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Symptoms like Focal neurologic deficit, radiating pain or neurogenic claudication. 2. Patients with history of previous spine surgeries at area of interest. 3. Patients with extradural or intradural tumours, vertebral fractures, spondylodiscitis and unstable Spondylolisthesis. 4. Patient with metabolic disorders, inflammatory arthritis and coagulation disorders. 5. Patients with local dermal infection at area of interest.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
mean change on VAS and NRS scale from baseline to 6 month visit.Timepoint: time of intervention, 6 month visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.mean change in the SF 36 scale from baseline to the 6-month visit. 2.mean change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to the 6-month visit 3.volume of area ablated in both the groups through MRI at an interval of 6 months.Timepoint: time of intervention , 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAbhishek Anand

AIIMS Patna

drprabhatagrawal@gmail.com9811663869

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026