Skip to content

Ease of i-gel insertion with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl along with propofol and hemodynamic variability

Comparative evaluation of i-gel insertion conditions using dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl - A randomised controlled study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/10/075234
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-10-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: evaluation of i-gel® insertion conditions using dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl: Patients baseline parameters such as heart rate, Electrocardiogram (ECG), mean arterial pressure, respi

Sponsors

shri devaraj urs medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia Age: 18 -60 years. ASA physical status 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe respiratory or cardiac disorders, hepatic or renal insufficiency, coagulopathy. 2. Allergy to any of the study drug (Test dose to be given). 3. Pregnancy or breast feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess ease of I gel insertion using youngs criteria, lund and stoyener gradingTimepoint: to assess ease of I gel insertion using youngs criteria, lund and stoyener grading

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess overall condition of I gel insertion using modified scheme of lund & stovnerTimepoint: base line haemodynamic parameter such as heart rate,blood pressure, respiratory rate. before insertion & 1,3,5and 10 minutes after insertion

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSindhura

shri devaraj urs medical college

Dr.nkiran@gmail.com9740468460

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026