Fit of temporary crown fabricated by machine vs manually

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Gap and Internal Fit in Provisional Crowns Fabricated by Conventional Technique and CAD CAM Milling Technique – An in vivo study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/10/074555

Enrollment

Registered

2024-10-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Provisional crown by Computer aided designing and Computer aided manufacturing technique: Provisional crown fabricated from Computer aided designing and Computer aided manufacturing tec

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in need of crown over permanent mandibular 1st molar are selected.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with age group below 15 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Provisional crowns made by CAD CAM milling fabrication method will have better marginal and internal fit than conventional method.Timepoint: Assessment will be done at the end of 12 month.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: NA	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMithilesh Dhamande

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

miths_d@rediffmail.com9890590584

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026