FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of effectiveness of mulligan technique versus mckenzie mobilization in cervical radiculopathy patients using neck disability index

A comparative study to find out the effectiveness of mulligan versus mckenzie mobilization in cervical radiculopathy - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/09/074496
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-09-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M501- Cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Mulligan Mobilization technique: Exercise in this group consists of functional SNAG/cervical MWMs, Natural apophyseal glides (NAGs), Sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAGs) with he

Sponsors

Manish Kumar Sah
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient having primary complain of radicular neck pain. Pain intensity greater than 2 and less than 10 on NPRS. Duration of illness two weeks including pain and stiffness. Pain aggravated by movement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Infective condition of spine. Autoimmune disorders. Malignancy. Any history of spine surgery. Spinal deformity. Osteoporosis. Neck pain due to trauma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Neck disability index (NDI)Timepoint: 1st day of Assessment and after 4 weeks of treatment—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NUMERICAL PAIN RATING SCALETimepoint: 1st day of treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRajnee Mishra

Burdwan Institute of Medical and Life Sciences

anwarshahzada@yahoo.com9732445289

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026